Head-to-Head Analysis
This analysis was generated using Azimuth's proprietary framework. Our data model transforms federal education data into actionable insights. Learn about founder Daniel Rogers, explore our research methodology, or see how we think about this data.
Updated January 2026 • Abilene, TX & Greenville, SC
When students choose between Abilene Christian University and Furman University, they're comparing two private institutions with radically different missions and markets. ACU operates as an accessible Christian university in Texas serving 60% Pell grant recipients, while Furman functions as a selective liberal arts college in South Carolina serving predominantly affluent students.
The question isn't which produces higher raw earnings — it's which delivers better value relative to the students they serve and the investment required.
Median Student Debt at Graduation
$24,250
federal loans
$23,250
federal loans
Median Parent PLUS Loans
$26,542
borrowed by parents
$54,750
borrowed by parents
ACU is predominantly business-focused, with 27% of graduates earning degrees in business fields. The largest programs include Sports and Kinesiology (72 graduates), Finance (71), and Nursing (67), reflecting practical career preparation.
Furman emphasizes social sciences, with 16% in that field. Top programs include Communication (98 graduates), Health Professions (69), and Political Science (67), suggesting more liberal arts preparation.
ACU's program mix aligns with immediate workforce entry, while Furman's suggests graduate school preparation or professional careers requiring broader foundational knowledge.
For students prioritizing institutional effectiveness and affordability, ACU delivers remarkable value — transforming outcomes for students predicted to earn less while costing $17,283/year less. Furman offers higher absolute earnings and prestige, making it better for students who can afford the investment and value the selective liberal arts experience.
The data points to ACU as demonstrating stronger institutional impact, achieving impressive economic mobility for its student population. However, the right choice depends on your financial capacity, career goals, and whether you prioritize raw earnings or value-added outcomes.
If cost matters and you're drawn to ACU's programs, the financial and effectiveness data strongly favor the Texas school.
Key Takeaway
The numbers are close, but the best school depends on your goals, values, and career aspirations.
This comparison was generated using Azimuth's proprietary ROI framework, developed by founder Daniel Rogers. Our methodology transforms federal education data into actionable insights for families.
This comparison uses Azimuth's proprietary ROI model based on U.S. Dept. of Education data. View Full Methodology.
This content is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial, investment, or professional advice. Consult a qualified advisor before making any financial decisions.
College Azimuth is a private research initiative and is not affiliated with the U.S. Department of Education or Federal Student Aid.
