Head-to-Head Analysis
This analysis was generated using Azimuth's proprietary framework. Our data model transforms federal education data into actionable insights. Learn about founder Daniel Rogers, explore our research methodology, or see how we think about this data.
Updated January 2026 • Abilene, TX & Aston, PA
When students choose between Abilene Christian University and Neumann University, they're comparing two private institutions with fundamentally different track records of student success. Both produce similar earnings outcomes around $56,000 at the median, but ACU achieves this while serving a more economically disadvantaged student population and charging significantly less.
The data reveals ACU's remarkable institutional effectiveness: graduates earn $18,627 beyond what we'd predict based on student demographics, compared to Neumann's more modest $9,321 premium.
Median Student Debt at Graduation
$24,250
federal loans
$27,000
federal loans
Median Parent PLUS Loans
$26,542
borrowed by parents
$33,530
borrowed by parents
ACU is predominantly business-focused, with 27% of graduates earning degrees in business fields. The largest programs include Sports/Kinesiology (72 graduates), Finance (71), and Nursing (67), reflecting a mix of professional preparation.
Neumann has a different emphasis, with Nursing leading at 79 graduates, followed by Liberal Arts (67) and Protective Services (39). ACU offers broader program diversity across business, health, and education, while Neumann concentrates more heavily on health professions and general studies.
These different program compositions contribute to distinct career pathway preparation.
For students prioritizing institutional effectiveness and affordability, ACU delivers comparable career outcomes at $16,000 per year less while serving a more challenging student population. The $18,627 earnings premium demonstrates ACU's ability to elevate student outcomes beyond demographic predictions — institutional effectiveness in action.
Neumann offers slightly higher raw earnings and a Pennsylvania location, making it better for students specifically drawn to the Northeast. The data points to ACU as demonstrating stronger value and institutional impact, but the right choice depends on your geographic preferences, program interests, and family financial capacity.
If cost and proven student success matter most, ACU is the clear choice.
Key Takeaway
The numbers are close, but the best school depends on your goals, values, and career aspirations.
This comparison was generated using Azimuth's proprietary ROI framework, developed by founder Daniel Rogers. Our methodology transforms federal education data into actionable insights for families.
This comparison uses Azimuth's proprietary ROI model based on U.S. Dept. of Education data. View Full Methodology.
This content is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial, investment, or professional advice. Consult a qualified advisor before making any financial decisions.
College Azimuth is a private research initiative and is not affiliated with the U.S. Department of Education or Federal Student Aid.
