Head-to-Head Analysis
This analysis was generated using Azimuth's proprietary framework. Our data model transforms federal education data into actionable insights. Learn about founder Daniel Rogers, explore our research methodology, or see how we think about this data.
Updated January 2026 • Abilene, TX & Rochester, NY
When students choose between Abilene Christian University and St. John Fisher University, they're comparing two private institutions with dramatically different missions.
ACU serves 60% Pell grant recipients with open admission in Texas. Fisher serves 28% Pell recipients with selective admission in New York.
The earnings data reveals a story about institutional effectiveness: ACU delivers $18,627 in earnings beyond demographic predictions, while Fisher falls short of expectations despite higher raw outcomes.
Median Student Debt at Graduation
$24,250
federal loans
$23,250
federal loans
Median Parent PLUS Loans
$26,542
borrowed by parents
$37,716
borrowed by parents
ACU is predominantly business-focused, with 27% of graduates earning degrees in business fields. Fisher is health-focused, with nursing as its flagship program (211 graduates annually).
ACU's largest programs include Sports/Kinesiology (72 graduates), Finance (71), and Nursing (67). Fisher's top programs include Nursing (211 graduates), Biology (51), and Psychology (51).
These different program concentrations help explain the earnings gap but don't account for the effectiveness difference between institutions.
For students prioritizing institutional effectiveness and affordability, ACU delivers exceptional value by transforming outcomes for students predicted to earn less. Fisher offers higher raw earnings and stronger completion rates, making it the better choice for students who can afford the premium and value those outcomes.
The data points to ACU as demonstrating superior institutional impact — taking students with challenging demographics and helping them exceed expectations. The right choice depends on whether you prioritize raw outcomes or institutional effectiveness, but ACU's ability to beat expectations while costing $15,436 less annually makes it the stronger financial value for most families.
Key Takeaway
The numbers are close, but the best school depends on your goals, values, and career aspirations.
This comparison was generated using Azimuth's proprietary ROI framework, developed by founder Daniel Rogers. Our methodology transforms federal education data into actionable insights for families.
This comparison uses Azimuth's proprietary ROI model based on U.S. Dept. of Education data. View Full Methodology.
This content is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial, investment, or professional advice. Consult a qualified advisor before making any financial decisions.
College Azimuth is a private research initiative and is not affiliated with the U.S. Department of Education or Federal Student Aid.
