Head-to-Head Analysis
This analysis was generated using Azimuth's proprietary framework. Our data model transforms federal education data into actionable insights. Learn about founder Daniel Rogers, explore our research methodology, or see how we think about this data.
Updated January 2026 • Abilene, TX & Young Harris, GA
When students choose between Abilene Christian University and Young Harris College, they're comparing two private institutions that serve fundamentally different student populations. ACU serves 60% Pell grant recipients while Young Harris serves 21%—yet ACU's graduates significantly outperform earnings expectations while Young Harris falls short.
Both schools emphasize business programs, but the outcomes data reveals a clear difference in institutional effectiveness. The question isn't just about cost, but about which school better supports student success.
Median Student Debt at Graduation
$24,250
federal loans
$27,000
federal loans
Median Parent PLUS Loans
$26,542
borrowed by parents
$26,000
borrowed by parents
Both schools are business-focused, with ACU awarding 27% of degrees in business fields and Young Harris 23%. ACU's largest programs include Sports/Kinesiology (72 graduates), Finance (71), and Nursing (67), reflecting strength in professional fields.
Young Harris concentrates on Business Administration (31 graduates), Psychology (20), and Biology (12). ACU's program mix includes more healthcare and applied programs, while Young Harris offers broader liberal arts exposure.
These program differences help explain the divergent career trajectories and earning patterns between the institutions.
For students prioritizing career outcomes and institutional effectiveness, ACU delivers substantially stronger value despite serving a more challenging student population. Young Harris offers a small college experience in Georgia's mountains and costs slightly less upfront, making it suitable for students who prioritize setting and can manage the weaker earnings trajectory.
The data points to ACU as the stronger choice for most students—it demonstrates superior ability to help students succeed financially while maintaining its access mission. If career outcomes and economic mobility matter most, ACU's track record of exceeding expectations makes it the clear winner.
The modest cost difference pales compared to the significant earnings advantage and stronger institutional support.
Key Takeaway
The numbers are close, but the best school depends on your goals, values, and career aspirations.
This comparison was generated using Azimuth's proprietary ROI framework, developed by founder Daniel Rogers. Our methodology transforms federal education data into actionable insights for families.
This comparison uses Azimuth's proprietary ROI model based on U.S. Dept. of Education data. View Full Methodology.
This content is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial, investment, or professional advice. Consult a qualified advisor before making any financial decisions.
College Azimuth is a private research initiative and is not affiliated with the U.S. Department of Education or Federal Student Aid.
