Head-to-Head Analysis
This analysis was generated using Azimuth's proprietary framework. Our data model transforms federal education data into actionable insights. Learn about founder Daniel Rogers, explore our research methodology, or see how we think about this data.
Updated January 2026 • Augusta, GA & Radford, VA
When students choose between Augusta University and Radford University, they're weighing cost savings against earning potential. Both are medium-sized public universities with strong health program concentrations, but Augusta costs $3,293 less per year while Radford graduates earn $5,267 more at the median ten years out.
The question becomes whether the higher investment in Radford pays off over time, or if Augusta's affordability advantage makes it the smarter financial choice.
Median Student Debt at Graduation
$20,500
federal loans
$24,000
federal loans
Median Parent PLUS Loans
$15,568
borrowed by parents
$22,158
borrowed by parents
Both universities concentrate heavily on health programs, with nursing leading graduation numbers at each institution. Augusta produces 181 nursing graduates annually alongside strong programs in Psychology (72 graduates) and Kinesiology (71).
Radford graduates 219 nurses yearly, but shows more diversity with Interdisciplinary Studies (169), Psychology (150), and Education (146). Augusta's program mix includes 14% Business and 6% Social Sciences, while Radford balances 15% Business, 8% Education, and 7% Arts.
This program similarity helps explain their comparable career preparation despite different earnings outcomes.
For students prioritizing immediate affordability, Augusta delivers solid health science education at $3,293/year less with manageable debt levels. Radford offers higher earning potential and demonstrates stronger institutional effectiveness, making it worth considering for families who can handle the additional investment.
The data suggests Radford provides modestly better financial outcomes over time, but Augusta's cost advantage makes it the practical choice for budget-conscious families. Both schools serve their students well — the right choice depends on whether you prioritize upfront savings or long-term earning potential.
Given the comparable graduation rates and program quality, your decision should focus on financial capacity and career ambitions.
Key Takeaway
The numbers are close, but the best school depends on your goals, values, and career aspirations.
This comparison was generated using Azimuth's proprietary ROI framework, developed by founder Daniel Rogers. Our methodology transforms federal education data into actionable insights for families.
This comparison uses Azimuth's proprietary ROI model based on U.S. Dept. of Education data. View Full Methodology.
This content is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial, investment, or professional advice. Consult a qualified advisor before making any financial decisions.
College Azimuth is a private research initiative and is not affiliated with the U.S. Department of Education or Federal Student Aid.
