Outcomes-based program rankings.
Program outcomes at Cedarville University vary significantly by field of study. These rankings evaluate each program by post-graduation earnings, debt burden, and return on investment — not prestige or reputation.
Use this analysis to compare programs and understand which fields deliver the strongest outcomes.
Analyzing 19 programs with available earnings data.
recent graduates
This bar shows the range of median earnings across all majors at this school.
The tables below compare programs in each category by earnings, rank, debt, and cohort size.
These sections represent the complete set of ranked undergraduate programs at Cedarville University.
Computer Science. leads engineering & technology with 110K in median earnings.
| Program | National Rank | Median Earnings | Median Debt | Cohort Size |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Computer Science. | — | $109,817★ | — | 24 |
| Mechanical Engineering. | — | $86,062 | — |
Program rankings are derived entirely from post-graduation outcomes. We do not use reputation surveys, selectivity metrics, or SAT scores. This means some programs may rank differently than you'd expect based on prestige — and that's intentional.
Median earnings 10 years post-enrollment
Debt burden relative to earnings
Institutional contribution to outcomes
Resources, cohort size, and graduation rates
Trajectory from early to mid-career
| 53 |
| Computer Engineering.Small sample | — | $73,635 | — | 12 |
Finance and Financial Management Services. leads business & economics with 86K in median earnings.
| Program | National Rank | Median Earnings | Median Debt | Cohort Size |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Finance and Financial Management Services. | — | $86,487★ | — | 20 |
| Accounting and Related Services.Small sample | — | $77,937 | — | 17 |
| Business Administration, Management and Operations. | — | $64,395 | — | 24 |
| Marketing.Small sample | — | $45,025 | — | 19 |
Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Sciences, and Administration. leads health with 88K in median earnings.
| Program | National Rank | Median Earnings | Median Debt | Cohort Size |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Sciences, and Administration. | — | $87,777★ | — | 25 |
| Registered Nursing, Nursing Administration, Nursing Research and Clinical Nursing. | — | $73,789 | $45,000 | 119 |
Social Work. leads social sciences & policy with 52K in median earnings.
| Program | National Rank | Median Earnings | Median Debt | Cohort Size |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social Work.Small sample | — | $52,471★ | — | 18 |
| Psychology, General. | — | $26,353 | — | 33 |
Radio, Television, and Digital Communication. leads communications with 48K in median earnings.
| Program | National Rank | Median Earnings | Median Debt | Cohort Size |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radio, Television, and Digital Communication.Small sample | — | $47,782★ | — | 15 |
| Communication and Media Studies. | — | $34,958 | — | 27 |
Design and Applied Arts. leads humanities & arts with 52K in median earnings.
| Program | National Rank | Median Earnings | Median Debt | Cohort Size |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Design and Applied Arts. | — | $51,813★ | $36,000 | 45 |
| Bible/Biblical Studies.Small sample | — | $42,572 | — | 18 |
| Music.Small sample | — | $23,649 | — | 6 |
Teacher Education and Professional Development, Specific Subject Areas. leads education with 45K in median earnings.
| Program | National Rank | Median Earnings | Median Debt | Cohort Size |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Teacher Education and Professional Development, Specific Subject Areas.Small sample | — | $44,668★ | — | 18 |
| Teacher Education and Professional Development, Specific Levels and Methods. | — | $43,308 | — | 42 |
Sports, Kinesiology, and Physical Education/Fitness. leads other & interdisciplinary with 44K in median earnings.
| Program | National Rank | Median Earnings | Median Debt | Cohort Size |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sports, Kinesiology, and Physical Education/Fitness.Small sample | — | $44,418 | — | 19 |
Why rankings may differ by program: A university's nursing program and business program can have entirely different outcome profiles. Our methodology surfaces these differences so you can evaluate programs — not just institutions.
