Outcomes-based program rankings.
Program outcomes at Prairie View A&M vary significantly by field of study, with engineering and health programs delivering substantially higher earnings than education and social service fields. The rankings below evaluate programs based on graduate earnings, debt levels, and return on investment rather than reputation or prestige.
Use this data to compare how different majors perform in the post-graduation labor market and make informed decisions about academic focus.
Analyzing 27 programs with available earnings data.
These highlights identify programs that demonstrate strong performance across earnings potential, national ranking, and graduate employment outcomes.
#117 nationally
$34K median earnings
This bar shows the range of median earnings across all majors at this school.
The tables below compare programs by earnings potential, national ranking, debt management, and graduate cohort size to support informed academic planning.
These sections represent the complete set of ranked undergraduate programs at Prairie View A & M University.
Engineering programs at Prairie View A&M deliver the institution's strongest earnings outcomes, with Electrical and Electronics Engineering leading at $90,895 and Chemical Engineering at $86,785. These programs rank competitively nationally while maintaining strong Texas state rankings, demonstrating the university's STEM capabilities.
However, debt capacity varies, with some programs showing challenging repayment scenarios. This group best serves students prioritizing high earnings potential and willing to navigate demanding technical curricula.
| Program | National Rank | Median Earnings | Median Debt | Cohort Size |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electrical and Electronics Engineering. | #117 |
Program rankings at Prairie View A&M reflect post-graduation labor market outcomes rather than academic reputation or faculty quality. Earnings data comes from federal College Scorecard records tracking graduates four years after completion, representing real employment outcomes across diverse career paths. Rankings compare programs to similar majors nationally, with debt affordability calculated using Department of Education income-driven repayment models. Cohort sizes indicate program scale and institutional commitment, with larger programs typically offering more course variety and faculty resources. These metrics help students understand the financial implications of different academic choices while recognizing that career satisfaction, personal interests, and long-term professional goals extend beyond immediate earnings potential. Students should weigh these outcomes against their individual career aspirations, risk tolerance, and post-graduation plans including potential graduate school attendance.
Median earnings 10 years post-enrollment
Debt burden relative to earnings
Institutional contribution to outcomes
recent graduates
| — |
| 27 |
| Chemical Engineering, Other. | #73 | $86,785 | — | 58 |
| Artificial Intelligence. | #146 | $80,128 | — | 24 |
| Civil Engineering, General.Small sample | #147 | $71,276 | — | 19 |
| Mechanical Engineering. | #213 | $69,757 | — | 70 |
| Computer Engineering, General.Small sample | — | $69,338 | — | 5 |
| Construction Engineering Technology/Technician. | #33 | $60,575 | — | 29 |
Business programs at Prairie View A&M demonstrate mixed performance, with specialized fields like Digital Marketing ($50,889) and Accounting Technology ($55,300) outperforming general Business Administration ($36,949). The general business program faces particularly challenging debt scenarios with critical repayment risks, while specialized business fields maintain more manageable debt profiles.
Students should prioritize focused business specializations over general business studies for optimal career outcomes.
| Program | National Rank | Median Earnings | Median Debt | Cohort Size |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Banking and Financial Support Services.Small sample | #182 | $56,791★ | — | 19 |
| Accounting Technology/Technician and Bookkeeping. | #244 | $55,300 | — | 29 |
| Digital Marketing. | #156 | $50,889 | — | 22 |
| Information Resources Management.Small sample | #91 | $42,812 | — | 11 |
| Business Administration and Management, General. | #346 | $36,949 | $23,304 | 63 |
Health programs show dramatic variation in outcomes, with Adult Health Nurse/Nursing delivering exceptional value at $84,269 earnings and ranking #4 in Texas, while general Health Services graduates earn just $34,103. Nursing demonstrates excellent debt affordability with payments under 8% of discretionary income, while general health programs face challenging repayment scenarios.
This field rewards specialization, with targeted health professions significantly outperforming generalist approaches at Prairie View A&M.
| Program | National Rank | Median Earnings | Median Debt | Cohort Size |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adult Health Nurse/Nursing. | #69 | $84,269★ | $16,917 | 90 |
| Health Services/Allied Health/Health Sciences, General. | #57 | $34,103 | $8,800 | 71 |
Life sciences programs show modest earnings potential, with Biology graduates earning $41,030 while facing challenging debt repayment scenarios. The program ranks #301 nationally, indicating limited competitiveness compared to biology programs at other institutions.
Students pursuing sciences should consider the 27.7% graduate school continuation rate, as many science careers require advanced degrees that may improve long-term earning potential beyond the bachelor's level outcomes shown here.
| Program | National Rank | Median Earnings | Median Debt | Cohort Size |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biology, General. | #304 | $41,030 | $17,600 | 60 |
Social sciences programs typically produce moderate earnings with significant debt management challenges. Psychology graduates earn $40,281 but face challenging debt affordability, while American Government and Politics delivers $51,812 with more manageable debt scenarios.
Forensic Social Work provides stronger outcomes at $42,875 earnings. These programs best serve students prioritizing service-oriented careers who understand the trade-offs between mission-driven work and immediate earning potential.
| Program | National Rank | Median Earnings | Median Debt | Cohort Size |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| American Government and Politics (United States). | #205 | $51,812★ | — | 22 |
| Forensic Social Work. | #123 | $42,875 | — | 47 |
| Psychology, General. | #202 | $40,281 | $16,034 | 74 |
Communication and Media Studies graduates earn $37,494 with challenging debt affordability scenarios including critical repayment risks where income-based payments may not cover interest accumulation. The program ranks #172 nationally and #11 in Texas, showing moderate competitive positioning.
This field best suits students who prioritize creative or media-focused career paths and understand the financial trade-offs associated with communications careers in the current market environment.
| Program | National Rank | Median Earnings | Median Debt | Cohort Size |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Communication and Media Studies, Other. | #172 | $37,494 | $14,656 | 68 |
Exercise Science and Kinesiology, the university's largest program with 126 graduates, produces $39,074 median earnings with manageable debt profiles and represents Prairie View A&M's strength in health and fitness-related education. The program ranking of #122 nationally indicates solid competitive positioning within the kinesiology field.
This area best serves students interested in fitness, rehabilitation, or sports-related careers who value program size and institutional investment.
| Program | National Rank | Median Earnings | Median Debt | Cohort Size |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brass Instruments.Small sample | — | $45,835★ | — | 6 |
| English Language and Literature, General.Small sample | #321 | $25,194 | — | 11 |
| American History (United States).Small sample | — | $16,663 | — | 5 |
Agriculture programs at Prairie View A&M produce modest earnings at $33,817 with relatively small cohort sizes of 37 graduates, ranking #23 nationally which indicates competitive positioning within the agricultural field. However, earnings levels require careful financial planning given educational debt levels.
This program best serves students with genuine agricultural interests who may pursue careers in rural areas where cost of living adjustments improve relative financial outcomes.
| Program | National Rank | Median Earnings | Median Debt | Cohort Size |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agriculture, General. | #30 | $33,817 | — | 37 |
Corrections Administration delivers solid outcomes at $42,752 median earnings, ranking #117 nationally and #12 in Texas while maintaining challenging but manageable debt scenarios. The program shows Prairie View A&M's strength in preparing students for public safety and corrections careers, with outcomes reflecting the stable employment and benefit packages typical in government service positions that may not be captured in pure earnings metrics.
| Program | National Rank | Median Earnings | Median Debt | Cohort Size |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corrections Administration. | #118 | $42,752 | $11,800 | 94 |
Multi/Interdisciplinary Studies produces moderate earnings at $46,718 but with concerning debt levels at $25,439, creating challenging repayment scenarios. The program ranks #73 nationally, showing competitive positioning among similar interdisciplinary approaches.
These programs work best for students with specific career goals that require broad-based knowledge, though graduates should carefully consider debt management strategies and post-graduation employment planning.
| Program | National Rank | Median Earnings | Median Debt | Cohort Size |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architectural Design. | #50 | $51,200★ | — | 35 |
| Multi-/Interdisciplinary Studies, Other. | #78 | $46,718 | $25,439 | 52 |
| Exercise Science and Kinesiology. | #121 | $39,074 | $14,332 | 126 |
Resources, cohort size, and graduation rates
Trajectory from early to mid-career
Why rankings may differ by program: A university's nursing program and business program can have entirely different outcome profiles. Our methodology surfaces these differences so you can evaluate programs — not just institutions.
