Outcomes-based program rankings.
Program outcomes at The Chicago School At Los Angeles focus entirely on psychology education, offering specialized preparation in this field. The single program available demonstrates strong performance metrics including national rankings and earnings that exceed typical psychology programs.
Analyzing 1 programs with available earnings data.
This highlight showcases the institution's flagship psychology program with national ranking and strong value metrics.
#46 nationally
$40K median earnings
Psychology, General produces median earnings of $39,596, which aligns with national patterns for psychology bachelor's degrees. The program's earnings reflect typical career paths available to psychology graduates, including social services, human resources, and preparation for graduate study. Detailed earnings analysis is available in the program comparison table.
The institution's Psychology, General program ranks #57 nationally and #13 in California, demonstrating competitive performance within the psychology field. The program's national ranking places it in the top tier of psychology programs nationwide, while the state ranking reflects strong positioning within California's competitive higher education landscape. Students can reference the detailed program table to assess specific outcomes and value metrics.
The table below details program outcomes for psychology education at this specialized institution.
These sections represent the complete set of ranked undergraduate programs at The Chicago School At Los Angeles.
Psychology, General represents the institution's complete academic focus, ranking #57 nationally and #13 in California. With median earnings of $39,596 for a cohort of 34 graduates, the program achieves a value score of 83.8, indicating strong return on investment relative to similar psychology programs nationally.
This specialized focus allows for concentrated resources and faculty expertise in psychological sciences, making it well-suited for students committed to psychology career paths.
| Program | National Rank | Median Earnings | Median Debt | Cohort Size |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Psychology, General. | #46 | $39,596 |
Program outcomes reflect federal College Scorecard data based on graduates 10 years after enrollment. The single program focus at The Chicago School At Los Angeles allows for concentrated analysis of psychology career outcomes, though students should recognize that career paths within psychology vary significantly from clinical practice to organizational applications. Rankings compare programs nationally within the same field, while value scores incorporate earnings, debt, and completion factors. The cohort size of 34 graduates provides reliable data for analysis while reflecting the institution's specialized and focused educational approach. Earnings represent median figures for all program graduates, not specific career tracks within psychology.
Median earnings 10 years post-enrollment
Debt burden relative to earnings
Institutional contribution to outcomes
recent graduates
Psychology, General achieves a value score of 83.8, indicating strong return on investment relative to similar psychology programs nationally. This score incorporates factors including earnings outcomes, debt levels, and completion rates. The high value score suggests effective educational programming that translates into career success for graduates.
Psychology graduates face manageable debt obligations with expected 10-year payments of $228 monthly, representing 12-18% of discretionary income in the manageable affordability tier. The 10-year payoff timeline indicates reasonable debt levels relative to expected earnings in psychology careers. Students should consider this debt capacity when planning their educational financing.
| 34 |
Resources, cohort size, and graduation rates
Trajectory from early to mid-career
Why rankings may differ by program: A university's nursing program and business program can have entirely different outcome profiles. Our methodology surfaces these differences so you can evaluate programs — not just institutions.
