Head-to-Head Analysis
This analysis was generated using Azimuth's proprietary framework. Our data model transforms federal education data into actionable insights. Learn about founder Daniel Rogers, explore our research methodology, or see how we think about this data.
Updated January 2026 • Columbia, SC & Tuscaloosa, AL
When students choose between Stillman College and Columbia International University, they're comparing two small private institutions with fundamentally different missions and effectiveness. Both produce similar median earnings—$35,421 versus $38,951—but Stillman achieves this while serving 68% Pell grant recipients compared to Columbia International's 28%.
The data reveals a striking contrast in institutional effectiveness: Stillman beats earnings expectations while Columbia International falls short of predictions for its student population.
Median Student Debt at Graduation
$20,000
federal loans
$29,067
federal loans
Median Parent PLUS Loans
$12,275
borrowed by parents
$15,500
borrowed by parents
Stillman College is predominantly business-focused, with 26% of graduates earning degrees in business fields and another 20% in education. The largest programs include Business/Commerce (25 graduates annually) and Teacher Education (17 graduates).
Columbia International University emphasizes theology and biblical studies, with Bible/Biblical Studies producing 63 graduates annually, followed by Psychology (18) and Business Administration (16). These different program concentrations shape career trajectories but don't explain the institutional effectiveness gap between the schools.
For students who will complete their degrees and prioritize institutional effectiveness, Stillman College delivers stronger value despite affordability challenges at both schools. Stillman costs $9,388/year less and demonstrates superior ability to boost student outcomes beyond demographic predictions.
Columbia International offers higher graduation rates and a faith-based educational mission, making it the better choice for students who value those factors and can manage the additional cost. The data points to Stillman as the stronger financial value for students confident in their ability to graduate, but the completion risk cannot be ignored when making this decision.
Key Takeaway
The numbers are close, but the best school depends on your goals, values, and career aspirations.
This comparison was generated using Azimuth's proprietary ROI framework, developed by founder Daniel Rogers. Our methodology transforms federal education data into actionable insights for families.
This comparison uses Azimuth's proprietary ROI model based on U.S. Dept. of Education data. View Full Methodology.
This content is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial, investment, or professional advice. Consult a qualified advisor before making any financial decisions.
College Azimuth is a private research initiative and is not affiliated with the U.S. Department of Education or Federal Student Aid.
