Head-to-Head Analysis
This analysis was generated using Azimuth's proprietary framework. Our data model transforms federal education data into actionable insights. Learn about founder Daniel Rogers, explore our research methodology, or see how we think about this data.
Updated January 2026 • Richmond, IN & Minneapolis, MN
When students choose between Earlham College and Minneapolis College Of Art And Design, they're comparing fundamentally different career paths at similar costs. Both are small private colleges, but one prepares students for diverse liberal arts careers while the other specializes in creative fields.
The data reveals a significant earnings gap that reflects these different professional trajectories, raising questions about long-term financial outcomes versus pursuing artistic passion.
Median Student Debt at Graduation
$23,488
federal loans
$27,000
federal loans
Median Parent PLUS Loans
$23,050
borrowed by parents
$30,397
borrowed by parents
Earlham is predominantly focused on Biological Sciences, with a diverse liberal arts mix including 15% Business, 10% STEM fields, and 8% Social Sciences. The largest programs include Business Administration (40 graduates), Biology (19), and Biochemistry (17).
MCAD concentrates heavily on Visual & Performing Arts, with 68% of graduates in arts fields and just 5% in business. MCAD's top programs are Design and Applied Arts (57 graduates), Graphic Communications (27), and Fine Arts (20).
This fundamental difference in academic focus shapes career outcomes and earning potential significantly.
For students prioritizing long-term earning potential, Earlham delivers significantly higher career outcomes at virtually the same cost. MCAD offers specialized artistic training and creative career preparation, making it the better choice for students committed to visual arts professions who understand the financial tradeoffs.
The data points to Earlham as the stronger financial value, but the right choice depends fundamentally on career aspirations rather than pure economics. Students drawn to creative fields may find MCAD's specialized training worth the financial sacrifice, while those seeking broader career flexibility and higher earnings potential should favor Earlham.
Individual results will vary significantly based on specific major, portfolio development, and career path within each field.
Key Takeaway
The numbers are close, but the best school depends on your goals, values, and career aspirations.
This comparison was generated using Azimuth's proprietary ROI framework, developed by founder Daniel Rogers. Our methodology transforms federal education data into actionable insights for families.
This comparison uses Azimuth's proprietary ROI model based on U.S. Dept. of Education data. View Full Methodology.
This content is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial, investment, or professional advice. Consult a qualified advisor before making any financial decisions.
College Azimuth is a private research initiative and is not affiliated with the U.S. Department of Education or Federal Student Aid.
