Head-to-Head Analysis
This analysis was generated using Azimuth's proprietary framework. Our data model transforms federal education data into actionable insights. Learn about founder Daniel Rogers, explore our research methodology, or see how we think about this data.
Updated January 2026 • Houghton, MI & Rolla, MO
When students choose between Michigan Technological University and Missouri University of Science and Technology, they're comparing two engineering powerhouses with remarkably similar missions but different financial profiles. Both are public, medium-sized institutions built around technical excellence.
The key differences emerge in cost structure and graduate earnings, where Missouri S&T delivers both lower net prices and higher median outcomes — a rare combination in higher education.
Median Student Debt at Graduation
$24,990
federal loans
$23,250
federal loans
Median Parent PLUS Loans
$29,300
borrowed by parents
$30,462
borrowed by parents
Both schools are predominantly engineering-focused, with Michigan Tech producing 60% engineering graduates and Missouri S&T at 67%. Michigan Tech's largest programs include Mechanical Engineering (283 graduates), Chemical Engineering (90), and Electrical Engineering (77).
Missouri S&T shows similar concentration: Mechanical Engineering (279 graduates), Electrical Engineering (138), and Computer Science (121). This shared engineering emphasis helps explain why both institutions produce strong median earnings, though Missouri S&T maintains a modest advantage in graduate outcomes.
For students prioritizing engineering education value, Missouri S&T delivers higher earnings at lower cost — an uncommon combination. Michigan Tech offers strong STEM programs and slightly higher completion rates, making it attractive for students who value those factors and don't mind paying modestly more.
The data points to Missouri S&T as the stronger financial value through its combination of lower net prices, higher median earnings, and superior institutional effectiveness metrics. Both schools prepare students well for technical careers, but Missouri S&T provides better financial outcomes.
If cost-conscious families are choosing between equivalent engineering programs, Missouri S&T represents the clearer financial choice.
Key Takeaway
The numbers are close, but the best school depends on your goals, values, and career aspirations.
This comparison was generated using Azimuth's proprietary ROI framework, developed by founder Daniel Rogers. Our methodology transforms federal education data into actionable insights for families.
This comparison uses Azimuth's proprietary ROI model based on U.S. Dept. of Education data. View Full Methodology.
This content is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial, investment, or professional advice. Consult a qualified advisor before making any financial decisions.
College Azimuth is a private research initiative and is not affiliated with the U.S. Department of Education or Federal Student Aid.
