Head-to-Head Analysis
This analysis was generated using Azimuth's proprietary framework. Our data model transforms federal education data into actionable insights. Learn about founder Daniel Rogers, explore our research methodology, or see how we think about this data.
Updated January 2026 • Rolla, MO & St. Louis, MO
When students choose between Missouri University of Science and Technology and Washington University in St. Louis, they're comparing two fundamentally different approaches to excellence.
Both produce strong graduates earning over $80,000 at the median, but Missouri S&T achieves this while serving students predicted to earn $17,400 less based on demographics — a sign of exceptional institutional effectiveness. The question becomes: do you want proven value or prestigious brand recognition?
Median Student Debt at Graduation
$23,250
federal loans
$17,500
federal loans
Median Parent PLUS Loans
$30,462
borrowed by parents
$24,585
borrowed by parents
Missouri S&T is predominantly engineering-focused, with 67% of graduates earning degrees in engineering fields. The largest programs include Mechanical Engineering (279 graduates), Electrical Engineering (138), and Computer Science (121).
WashU has a more balanced mix: 18% Business, 14% Social Sciences, 14% Engineering. Top programs include Computer Science (180 graduates), Finance (160), and Psychology (148).
This program composition difference shapes career outcomes, with Missouri S&T's technical focus driving its exceptional earnings premium despite serving a more challenging student population.
For students prioritizing financial value and technical excellence, Missouri S&T delivers exceptional outcomes at $8,300/year less than WashU. The school's ability to produce $82,957 median earnings while serving students predicted to earn $17,400 less demonstrates remarkable institutional effectiveness.
WashU offers prestige, higher completion rates, and broader academic opportunities — making it the better choice for students seeking a comprehensive liberal arts experience who can manage the higher cost. The data points to Missouri S&T as the stronger financial value for committed engineering students, but WashU may be worth the premium for students wanting maximum optionality and can afford the investment.
Key Takeaway
The numbers are close, but the best school depends on your goals, values, and career aspirations.
This comparison was generated using Azimuth's proprietary ROI framework, developed by founder Daniel Rogers. Our methodology transforms federal education data into actionable insights for families.
This comparison uses Azimuth's proprietary ROI model based on U.S. Dept. of Education data. View Full Methodology.
This content is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial, investment, or professional advice. Consult a qualified advisor before making any financial decisions.
College Azimuth is a private research initiative and is not affiliated with the U.S. Department of Education or Federal Student Aid.
