Head-to-Head Analysis
This analysis was generated using Azimuth's proprietary framework. Our data model transforms federal education data into actionable insights. Learn about founder Daniel Rogers, explore our research methodology, or see how we think about this data.
Updated January 2026 • Rochester, NY & Easton, MA
When students choose between Stonehill College and St. John Fisher University, they're comparing two private institutions with similar missions but different outcomes.
Both are medium-sized colleges serving primarily traditional undergraduate students, but they diverge on career preparation and earning potential. Stonehill sits in Massachusetts near Boston's job market, while St.
John Fisher operates in Rochester, New York. The key question: does Stonehill's higher cost translate to better financial returns?
Median Student Debt at Graduation
$23,250
federal loans
$25,000
federal loans
Median Parent PLUS Loans
$37,716
borrowed by parents
$58,576
borrowed by parents
Stonehill College is predominantly business-focused, with 24% of graduates earning degrees in business fields, followed by 19% in social sciences and 6% in education. The largest programs include Psychology (97 graduates annually), Criminology (72), and Finance (52).
St. John Fisher emphasizes health programs, with nursing leading at 211 graduates annually, followed by Biology and Psychology (51 each).
This program composition — Stonehill's business concentration versus St. John Fisher's health focus — helps explain the different career trajectories and earning potential between institutions.
For students prioritizing career earnings and strong return on investment, Stonehill College delivers measurably better financial outcomes despite its higher cost. The $1,819 annual premium translates to a $10,801 earnings advantage — a compelling value proposition for families who can manage the higher payments.
St. John Fisher offers a more affordable path with solid outcomes, particularly for students interested in healthcare careers where the nursing program provides strong regional placement.
The data favors Stonehill for students focused on business careers and long-term earning potential, but St. John Fisher serves students well who prioritize lower debt burden and healthcare pathways.
Both represent solid educational investments, but Stonehill offers the stronger financial return for those who can afford the entry cost.
Key Takeaway
The numbers are close, but the best school depends on your goals, values, and career aspirations.
This comparison was generated using Azimuth's proprietary ROI framework, developed by founder Daniel Rogers. Our methodology transforms federal education data into actionable insights for families.
This comparison uses Azimuth's proprietary ROI model based on U.S. Dept. of Education data. View Full Methodology.
This content is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial, investment, or professional advice. Consult a qualified advisor before making any financial decisions.
College Azimuth is a private research initiative and is not affiliated with the U.S. Department of Education or Federal Student Aid.
