Head-to-Head Analysis
This analysis was generated using Azimuth's proprietary framework. Our data model transforms federal education data into actionable insights. Learn about founder Daniel Rogers, explore our research methodology, or see how we think about this data.
Updated January 2026 • Hoboken, NJ & Worcester, MA
When students choose between Worcester Polytechnic Institute and Stevens Institute Of Technology, they're comparing two elite private engineering schools with remarkably similar profiles. Both deliver six-figure median earnings and excellent return on investment.
The key differences lie in location — Massachusetts versus New Jersey — and program concentration. Stevens graduates typically earn $5,302 more despite lower annual costs, creating a modest financial edge.
Median Student Debt at Graduation
$27,000
federal loans
$27,000
federal loans
Median Parent PLUS Loans
$53,192
borrowed by parents
$53,567
borrowed by parents
WPI is predominantly engineering-focused, with 66% of graduates earning degrees in engineering fields. Stevens has a more balanced mix: 57% Engineering, 12% Business.
WPI's largest programs include Mechanical Engineering (262 graduates annually) and Computer Science (201). Stevens emphasizes Mechanical Engineering (141), Business Administration (89), and Computer Engineering (76).
WPI's deeper engineering concentration shapes its culture, while Stevens' business component broadens career pathways into management and entrepreneurship.
For students prioritizing financial value, Stevens Institute Of Technology delivers notably higher earnings ($5,302 more) at lower annual cost ($2,805 less). WPI offers deeper engineering immersion and demonstrates stronger institutional effectiveness while serving students predicted to earn less.
Stevens provides the better financial outcome, but WPI's project-based curriculum and Massachusetts location appeal to specific student preferences. The data points to Stevens as the stronger financial value, though both schools deliver excellent return on investment.
Your choice should prioritize program fit, location preference, and campus culture over financial differences.
Key Takeaway
The numbers are close, but the best school depends on your goals, values, and career aspirations.
This comparison was generated using Azimuth's proprietary ROI framework, developed by founder Daniel Rogers. Our methodology transforms federal education data into actionable insights for families.
This comparison uses Azimuth's proprietary ROI model based on U.S. Dept. of Education data. View Full Methodology.
This content is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial, investment, or professional advice. Consult a qualified advisor before making any financial decisions.
College Azimuth is a private research initiative and is not affiliated with the U.S. Department of Education or Federal Student Aid.
