Compare 5 Computer Hardware Technology/Technician. programs in New York. Average earnings: $67,435.
With top graduates earning $119,498, Computer Hardware Technology/Technician stands out as a field where program choice matters more than school name. The gap between the best and median programs exceeds $58K—proof that evaluating programs individually beats relying on institutional prestige.
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute's Computer Hardware Technology program leads with graduates earning $119,498, nearly double the state average of $67,435. Rochester Institute of Technology follows at $65,000, while CUNY New York City College of Technology delivers $61,345—demonstrating that strong outcomes aren't exclusive to private institutions.
High earnings don't tell the whole story—debt burden matters. Rensselaer graduates borrow $23,750 and face just a 3.4% payment burden, landing in the 'Excellent' category. For families, CUNY NYC College of Technology leads with a 7.6% family burden—proof that the best choice depends on who's paying.
Highest program earnings: $119,498
Strong outcomes with 58% acceptance
3.4% payment burden | Excellent
7.6% family burden | Excellent
| Rank | School | Program Earnings | Cohort Size | Student Debt | Student GPS | Parent Debt | Parent GPS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | $119,498 | 74 | $23,750 | Excellent | $52,241 | Good | |
| #2 | $64,990 | 21 | $26,778 | Good | $35,625 | Challenging | |
| #3 | $61,345 | 117 | $10,533 | Excellent | $9,563 | Excellent | |
| #4 | $50,856 | 15 | $17,250 | Good | $18,928 | Challenging | |
| #5 | $40,485 | 20 | $14,718 | Good | $18,349 | High |
Our program rankings answer: "Which schools have the best outcomes for graduates of this specific major?"
Unlike traditional rankings that measure overall school quality, these rankings focus on program-level outcomes. A school that's #200 overall might have a top-10 nursing program — and that matters if you're studying nursing.
Data based on 2024-2025 Dept of Education reporting standards. Learn about our methodology →