Four years after completing a degree, federally aided graduates who are working and not enrolled earn a median of $59,094, in the 47th percentile. That is $9,156 below the $68,250 median for comparable institutions (same type and size).
Graduates earn about $2,887 less than the model expects for similar students. That puts the gap at the 44th percentile.
Azimuth places the return pillar at the 49th percentile among nonprofit four-year institutions. The part the model attributes to the factors it measures (field of study, enrollment and the local labor market) adds $4,437.
The part it attributes to a remainder it does not explain subtracts $7,324. Within the measured factors, the STEM component adds $1,401.
Four years after completing a degree, federally aided graduates of Baldwin Wallace University who are working and not enrolled earn a median of $59,094. That figure sits at the 47th percentile among nonprofit four-year institutions, drawn from an earnings cohort of 1,064 completers.
Graduates earn about $2,887 less than the model expects for similar students. Earnings scenarios estimated from the program mix show a typical outcome of $59,094, with a downside scenario of $41,587 and an upside scenario of $81,346.
An estimated 27.4% of graduates continue to graduate study, based on the program mix.
Return is the strongest Azimuth pillar at Baldwin Wallace University. Federally aided completers who are working and not enrolled have median earnings of $59,094 four years after completion, in the 47th percentile.
The peer median, the middle value for comparable institutions (same type and size), is $68,250; the university sits $9,156 below it. Graduates earn about $2,887 less than the model expects for similar students.
Earnings beyond expectations, the gap between what graduates earn and what the model expects for similar students, is in the 44th percentile among nonprofit four-year institutions. Azimuth ranks Baldwin Wallace University #748 for return among nonprofit four-year institutions.
Downside and upside earnings scenarios grounded in the program mix are $41,587 and $81,346. The part the model attributes to the factors it measures (field of study, enrollment and the local labor market) adds $4,437.
The part it attributes to a remainder it does not explain subtracts $7,324. Within the measured factors, the STEM component adds $1,401.
The peer comparison and the model expectation both point below their reference points. Accounting has 34 degrees awarded and median earnings of $86,955 four years after completion, or 1.14x of the national median for its field.
Nursing records 35 degrees awarded and $75,687 in median earnings at the same point. Finance has 30 degrees awarded and median earnings of $74,535, while Drama/Theatre Arts and Stagecraft has 31 degrees awarded and median earnings of $36,251. These fields show a wide range in earnings across the programs named here.
Earnings at Baldwin Wallace University vary widely across the modeled program-mix scenarios. The downside earnings scenario is $41,587, while the upside scenario is $81,346; these are scenarios rather than observed groups of graduates.
Among programs, median earnings four years after completion are $86,955 in Accounting, $75,687 in Nursing, and $74,535 in Finance. Those program figures give the modeled range a practical meaning: field choice coincides with very different earnings levels.
Baldwin Wallace University has borrowing and price figures that sit above peer reference points. Among borrowers who completed, median federal student loan debt is $27,000.
For comparable institutions (same type and size), the peer median is $24,199, and the university’s figure is above it by $2,801. That debt corresponds to an estimated payment of $307 a month if repaid over ten years.
Parent borrowers have median Parent PLUS debt of $31,484. Average net price, what aid recipients pay after grants and scholarships, is $27,603.
That is above the $27,371 peer median by $232, while aid covers about 50% of the published cost for the average aid recipient. Graduates earn about $2,887 less than the model expects for similar students. The peer comparisons and the model result point in the same direction.