Field choice matters when reading Alfred University’s return figures. Azimuth places its return pillar in the 20th percentile among nonprofit four-year institutions.
Graduates earn about $9,159 less than the model expects for similar students. Azimuth puts that earnings-beyond-expectations measure in the 22nd percentile.
The part the model attributes to the factors it measures (field of study, enrollment and the local labor market) subtracts $1,352. The part it attributes to a remainder it does not explain subtracts $7,807.
Federally aided completers who are working and not enrolled earn median earnings of $58,242 four years after completion, in the 44th percentile. The peer median, the middle value for comparable institutions of the same type and size, is $55,915, and the university’s median is above it by $2,327. The peer comparison and model expectation point in different directions.
For federally aided completers who are working and not enrolled, median earnings at Alfred University are $58,242 four years after completion. Azimuth places that measure in the 44th percentile among nonprofit four-year institutions, based on 609 completers.
The typical earnings scenario, based on the program mix, is $58,242. An estimated 26.0% of graduates continue to graduate study, a figure estimated from the program mix rather than observed enrollment.
These figures describe a defined federally aided cohort, not what every alumnus earns. The median and typical scenario align, while graduate study remains an estimate rather than an observed destination.
For Alfred University, return measures pull in different directions: earnings are above comparable peers but below the model's expectation. Federally aided completers who are working and not enrolled have median earnings of $58,242 four years after completion, placing them in the 44th percentile.
The peer median, the middle value for comparable institutions (same type and size), is $55,915; Alfred's figure is $2,327 above it. Graduates earn about $9,159 less than the model expects for similar students.
Earnings beyond expectations, the gap between what graduates earn and what the model expects for similar students, sits in the 22nd percentile. Azimuth places its return pillar in the 20th percentile among nonprofit four-year institutions.
The part the model attributes to the factors it measures (field of study, enrollment and the local labor market) subtracts $1,352. The part it attributes to a remainder it does not explain subtracts $7,807.
Within the measured factors, the STEM component adds $2,868. Earnings scenarios grounded in the program mix put the downside at $41,139 and the upside at $79,473.
Above-peer earnings and below-expected earnings leave a mixed return picture. Program earnings range widely across the fields with published outcomes.
Ceramic Sciences and Engineering is the highest-earning listed field, with 15 degrees awarded and median earnings of $83,641 four years after completion. Fine and Studio Arts was the largest program, awarding 69 degrees, and its median earnings were $38,877 four years after completion.
Earnings can differ widely depending on the program mix. The downside earnings scenario is $41,139, compared with an upside scenario of $79,473; these are scenarios rather than observed groups of graduates.
Among programs, median earnings four years after completion are $83,641 in Ceramic Sciences and Engineering, $79,452 in Mechanical Engineering, and $71,845 in Engineering. Those program results help explain the breadth of the modeled range.
Access is Alfred University’s strongest pillar, but its cost-and-earnings picture calls for close attention. Among borrowers who completed, median federal student loan debt is $26,000.
That is above the peer median—the middle value for comparable institutions (same type and size)—of $25,000, by $1,000. That debt corresponds to an estimated payment of $295 a month if repaid over ten years.
Earnings beyond expectations, the gap between what graduates earn and what the model expects for similar students, add to that caution. Graduates earn about $9,159 less than the model expects for similar students.
The average net price, what aid recipients pay after grants and scholarships, is $25,620. It stands above the $22,347 peer median for comparable institutions (same type and size), by $3,273.
Debt above peers, a higher net price, and below-expected earnings point in the same direction.