How this school serves students from different economic backgrounds, including Pell students, first-generation pathways, and long-term mobility outcomes.
Haverford College admits about 12.4% of applicants. The middle range of SAT scores for admitted students falls between 1,460 and 1,550, and ACT scores typically fall between 33 and 35. Among enrolled undergraduates, 15.4% receive Pell Grants and 16.2% are first-generation college students. Transfer enrollment is limited, at 1.8%. Azimuth ranks Haverford College #860 for access among nonprofit four-year institutions. The access ranking reflects the scale question: at a 12.4% admit rate, Haverford College's admission funnel is narrow, and the number of low-income and first-generation students it enrolls is limited relative to institutions that admit larger shares of their applicant pools. The six-year graduation rate is 89.6%, with freshman retention at 93.8%. Azimuth ranks Haverford College #456 for mobility among nonprofit four-year institutions. For low-income students who gain admission to Haverford College, outcomes reflect strong completion and earnings trajectories. The pattern is clear: low-income graduates who complete at Haverford College achieve outcomes that place the institution among the stronger performers in the country — but the institution's admission scale limits how many students benefit from that pathway. Azimuth's analysis of access versus outcomes at scale explores this structural dynamic in depth.
Haverford College admits about 12.4% of applicants. The middle range of SAT scores for admitted students falls between 1,460 and 1,550, and ACT scores typically fall between 33 and 35. Among enrolled undergraduates, 15.4% receive Pell Grants and 16.2% are first-generation college students. Transfer enrollment is limited, at 1.8%. Azimuth ranks Haverford College #860 for access among nonprofit four-year institutions. The access ranking reflects the scale question: at a 12.4% admit rate, Haverford College's admission funnel is narrow, and the number of low-income and first-generation students it enrolls is limited relative to institutions that admit larger shares of their applicant pools. The six-year graduation rate is 89.6%, with freshman retention at 93.8%. Azimuth ranks Haverford College #456 for mobility among nonprofit four-year institutions. For low-income students who gain admission to Haverford College, outcomes reflect strong completion and earnings trajectories. The pattern is clear: low-income graduates who complete at Haverford College achieve outcomes that place the institution among the stronger performers in the country — but the institution's admission scale limits how many students benefit from that pathway. Azimuth's analysis of access versus outcomes at scale explores this structural dynamic in depth.
Haverford College admits about 12.4% of applicants. The middle range of SAT scores for admitted students falls between 1,460 and 1,550, and ACT scores typically fall between 33 and 35. Among enrolled undergraduates, 15.4% receive Pell Grants and 16.2% are first-generation college students. Transfer enrollment is limited, at 1.8%. Azimuth ranks Haverford College #860 for access among nonprofit four-year institutions. The access ranking reflects the scale question: at a 12.4% admit rate, Haverford College's admission funnel is narrow, and the number of low-income and first-generation students it enrolls is limited relative to institutions that admit larger shares of their applicant pools. The six-year graduation rate is 89.6%, with freshman retention at 93.8%. Azimuth ranks Haverford College #456 for mobility among nonprofit four-year institutions. For low-income students who gain admission to Haverford College, outcomes reflect strong completion and earnings trajectories. The pattern is clear: low-income graduates who complete at Haverford College achieve outcomes that place the institution among the stronger performers in the country — but the institution's admission scale limits how many students benefit from that pathway. Azimuth's analysis of access versus outcomes at scale explores this structural dynamic in depth.
