How this school serves students from different economic backgrounds, including Pell students, first-generation pathways, and long-term mobility outcomes.
Missouri University of Science and Technology draws a focused student body shaped by its engineering-dominant identity. Missouri University of Science and Technology admits 72.5% of applicants, and among enrolled undergraduates, 22.8% receive Pell Grants and 22.5% are first-generation college students. Transfer enrollment accounts for 18.7% of the student body. The middle 50% of admitted students who submitted scores fell between 1,190 and 1,420 on the SAT and between 25 and 31 on the ACT (interquartile range of admitted-student scores). Azimuth ranks Missouri University of Science and Technology #792 for access among nonprofit four-year institutions. The access position reflects the institution's technical focus: a selective-by-mission engineering and science university naturally draws a narrower applicant pool than broad-access regional institutions, and its Pell and first-generation shares, while present, are more modest than those at open-enrollment peers. Where Missouri University of Science and Technology stands out is in what happens after students arrive. Retention is 86.6%, and the six-year graduation rate is 64.4%, with 63.5% of Pell-eligible students completing within that window. Median earnings for low-income graduates reach $63,900 on a historical ten-year Scorecard measure, placing this cohort in the 92.1 percentile for low-income graduate median earnings among nonprofit four-year institutions. Azimuth ranks Missouri University of Science and Technology #260 for mobility among nonprofit four-year institutions. As Azimuth's Illinois data analysis explores, high earnings and high mobility are not the same thing: the mobility ranking here reflects the combination of strong per-student outcomes and the scale at which the institution delivers them. For students from lower-income backgrounds who gain admission to Missouri S&T, the engineering and science pipeline translates into earnings outcomes that compare favorably with far larger and more resource-intensive institutions.
Missouri University of Science and Technology draws a focused student body shaped by its engineering-dominant identity. Missouri University of Science and Technology admits 72.5% of applicants, and among enrolled undergraduates, 22.8% receive Pell Grants and 22.5% are first-generation college students. Transfer enrollment accounts for 18.7% of the student body. The middle 50% of admitted students who submitted scores fell between 1,190 and 1,420 on the SAT and between 25 and 31 on the ACT (interquartile range of admitted-student scores). Azimuth ranks Missouri University of Science and Technology #792 for access among nonprofit four-year institutions. The access position reflects the institution's technical focus: a selective-by-mission engineering and science university naturally draws a narrower applicant pool than broad-access regional institutions, and its Pell and first-generation shares, while present, are more modest than those at open-enrollment peers. Where Missouri University of Science and Technology stands out is in what happens after students arrive. Retention is 86.6%, and the is 64.4%, with 63.5% of Pell-eligible students completing within that window. Median earnings for low-income graduates reach $63,900 on a historical ten-year Scorecard measure, placing this cohort in the 92.1 percentile for low-income graduate median earnings among nonprofit four-year institutions. Azimuth ranks Missouri University of Science and Technology #260 for mobility among nonprofit four-year institutions. As explores, high earnings and high mobility are not the same thing: the mobility ranking here reflects the combination of strong per-student outcomes and the scale at which the institution delivers them. For students from lower-income backgrounds who gain admission to Missouri S&T, the engineering and science pipeline translates into earnings outcomes that compare favorably with far larger and more resource-intensive institutions.
Missouri University of Science and Technology draws a focused student body shaped by its engineering-dominant identity. Missouri University of Science and Technology admits 72.5% of applicants, and among enrolled undergraduates, 22.8% receive Pell Grants and 22.5% are first-generation college students. Transfer enrollment accounts for 18.7% of the student body. The middle 50% of admitted students who submitted scores fell between 1,190 and 1,420 on the SAT and between 25 and 31 on the ACT (interquartile range of admitted-student scores). Azimuth ranks Missouri University of Science and Technology #792 for access among nonprofit four-year institutions. The access position reflects the institution's technical focus: a selective-by-mission engineering and science university naturally draws a narrower applicant pool than broad-access regional institutions, and its Pell and first-generation shares, while present, are more modest than those at open-enrollment peers. Where Missouri University of Science and Technology stands out is in what happens after students arrive. Retention is 86.6%, and the six-year graduation rate is 64.4%, with 63.5% of Pell-eligible students completing within that window. Median earnings for low-income graduates reach $63,900 on a historical ten-year Scorecard measure, placing this cohort in the 92.1 percentile for low-income graduate median earnings among nonprofit four-year institutions. Azimuth ranks Missouri University of Science and Technology #260 for mobility among nonprofit four-year institutions. As Azimuth's Illinois data analysis explores, high earnings and high mobility are not the same thing: the mobility ranking here reflects the combination of strong per-student outcomes and the scale at which the institution delivers them. For students from lower-income backgrounds who gain admission to Missouri S&T, the engineering and science pipeline translates into earnings outcomes that compare favorably with far larger and more resource-intensive institutions.
