University of Alabama at Birmingham shows above-expected earnings, though its median trails comparable institutions. Azimuth places the return pillar in the 69th percentile among nonprofit four-year institutions.
Graduates earn about $7,003 more than the model expects for similar students. The result, earnings beyond expectations—the gap between what graduates earn and the model expects for similar students—is in the 77th percentile among nonprofit four-year institutions.
The part the model attributes to the factors it measures (field of study, enrollment and the local labor market) adds $11,721. The part it attributes to a remainder it does not explain subtracts $4,718.
Federally aided completers working and not enrolled earn a median of $64,969 four years after completion, in the 66th percentile. The peer median for comparable institutions (same type and size) is $65,610; University of Alabama at Birmingham is $641 below it.
A four-year median of $64,969 gives University of Alabama at Birmingham graduates a clear earnings benchmark. That figure covers federally aided completers who are working and not enrolled, four years after completion.
Azimuth places the earnings measure in the 66th percentile among nonprofit four-year institutions, based on 3,428 completers. Earnings beyond expectations, the gap between what graduates earn and what the model expects for similar students, offers another view.
Graduates earn about $7,003 more than the model expects for similar students. Earnings scenarios based on the program mix place typical earnings at $64,969, with a downside scenario of $44,683 and an upside scenario of $82,466.
An estimated 33.1% of graduates continue to graduate study, a figure estimated from the program mix. The median and above-expected result point in the same direction, while the modeled range keeps program choice central.
Federally aided graduates who are working and not enrolled earn a median of $64,969 four years after completing a degree, placing the figure at the 66th percentile. That median is $641 below the $65,610 median posted by comparable institutions (same type and size) nationally.
For return, Azimuth ranks University of Alabama at Birmingham #451 among nonprofit four-year institutions nationally. Graduates of University of Alabama at Birmingham earn about $7,003 more than the model expects for similar students overall.
That outcome places the earnings beyond expectations gap at the 77th percentile. The part the model attributes to the factors it measures (field of study, enrollment and the local labor market) adds $11,721.
The part it attributes to a remainder it does not explain on its own subtracts $4,718. Within the measured factors, the STEM component adds $2,681.
Degrees awarded cluster in health professions, business and the biological sciences, while engineering and computer science fields are also well represented. Earnings scenarios estimated from that program mix range from $44,683 on the downside to $82,466 on the upside.
An estimated 33.1% of graduates continue on to graduate study, based on the overall degree program mix.
The range across modeled program-mix scenarios is wide, so the school-level median does not describe every field equally. The downside earnings scenario is $44,683, and the upside scenario is $82,466; neither is an observed graduate group.
At University of Alabama at Birmingham, borrower debt sits above the comparable-school midpoint, which tempers the earnings picture. Borrowers who completed have median federal student loan debt of $22,300.
The peer median, the middle value for comparable institutions (same type and size), is $20,076, and the university's figure is above it by $2,224. That debt corresponds to an estimated payment of $253 a month if repaid over ten years.
Average net price, what aid recipients pay after grants and scholarships, is $18,749, which is above the $15,634 peer median by $3,115. Across the five income bands from lowest to highest, average net prices are $16,172, $15,500, $19,161, $21,805, and $22,597.
Graduates earn about $7,003 more than the model expects for similar students. Above-expected earnings pull in a favorable direction, while higher debt and net price than comparable institutions pull the cost picture the other way.