Capital University posts earnings above its comparable peers, although graduates earn about $5,382 less than the model expects for similar students. The part the model attributes to the factors it measures (field of study, enrollment and the local labor market) adds $2,045.
The part it attributes to a remainder it does not explain subtracts $7,427. Federally aided completers who are working and not enrolled earn a median of $59,121 four years after completion, in the 48th percentile.
At comparable institutions (same type and size), the peer median, the middle value, is $55,915; the university stands above it by $3,206. Azimuth places the return pillar in the 46th percentile among nonprofit four-year institutions, while earnings beyond expectations sit in the 35th percentile.
At Capital University, federally aided completers who were working and not enrolled had median earnings of $59,121 four years after completion. The result draws on an earnings cohort of 956 completers and sits in the 48th percentile, as Azimuth places the measure among nonprofit four-year institutions.
The typical earnings scenario matches that observed median, while the downside scenario is $45,468 and the upside scenario is $80,000. An estimated 30.5% of graduates continue to graduate study, a figure estimated from the program mix.
Earnings beyond expectations, the gap between what graduates earn and what the model expects for similar students, are less favorable here. Graduates earn about $5,382 less than the model expects for similar students. The scenario range is wide, but the model result points below expectations.
Capital University’s return measures point in different directions. Federally aided completers who are working and not enrolled have median earnings of $59,121 four years after completion, placing them in the 48th percentile.
The peer median, the middle value for comparable institutions (same type and size), is $55,915, and the university’s figure is $3,206 above it. Graduates earn about $5,382 less than the model expects for similar students.
Earnings beyond expectations, the gap between what graduates earn and what the model expects for similar students, is in the 35th percentile. The part the model attributes to the factors it measures (field of study, enrollment and the local labor market) adds $2,045.
The part it attributes to a remainder it does not explain subtracts $7,427. Within the measured factors, the STEM component subtracts $93.
Downside and upside earnings scenarios grounded in the program mix are $45,468 and $80,000. Azimuth ranks the university #797 for return among nonprofit four-year institutions.
The peer comparison and the model do not point the same way. Program results range widely across the largest fields.
Nursing, the largest program, awarded 81 degrees and has median earnings of $77,807 four years after completion, 0.88x of the national median for its field. The largest fields therefore show a broad earnings spread.
The modeled range is wide enough that field choice is central to the earnings picture at Capital University. Scenarios run from $45,468 on the downside to $80,000 on the upside; these are earnings scenarios from the program mix, not observed groups of graduates.
Among the higher-earning fields, Business/Managerial Economics has median earnings of $84,669 four years after completion, followed by Accounting at $79,157 and Nursing at $77,807. Those field results help explain the upper end of the modeled range.
At Capital University, graduates earn about $5,382 less than the model expects for similar students. The earnings picture rests on raw salaries, with no margin over what the model expects.
That gap is part of the value case here. Borrowers who finish carry a median of $26,889 in federal student loans.
The peer median is the middle value for comparable institutions (same type and size). That amount is $1,889 above the peer median of $25,000.
The estimated monthly payment on that debt is $306 if repaid over ten years. Parents who borrow hold a separate median of $28,132. Both debt and earnings sit on the same side of their benchmarks.