Ohio Northern University offers a comparatively strong return picture: median earnings are $72,080 four years after completion, in the 79th percentile among nonprofit four-year institutions. That median is $3,830 above the peer median of $68,250, the middle value for comparable institutions (same type and size).
Graduates earn about $2,681 more than the model expects for similar students. That earnings-beyond-expectations result, the gap between what graduates earn and what the model expects for similar students, is in the 65th percentile.
The part the model attributes to the factors it measures (field of study, enrollment and the local labor market) adds $8,969. The part it attributes to a remainder it does not explain subtracts $6,288.
Azimuth places the return pillar in the 72nd percentile among nonprofit four-year institutions. Above-peer earnings and above-expected earnings point in the same direction.
Ohio Northern University graduates show a strong early earnings picture, with median earnings of $72,080 four years after completion. Azimuth places that earnings level in the 79th percentile among nonprofit four-year institutions.
The measure covers an earnings cohort of 537 federally aided completers who are working and not enrolled. A typical earnings scenario, based on the program mix rather than an observed group, is $72,080.
An estimated 26.6% of graduates continue to graduate study, a figure estimated from the program mix. The earnings median and the typical scenario point to a similar near-term outcome, while the graduate-study estimate signals that some graduates may continue their education.
At Ohio Northern University, federally aided completers who are working and not enrolled have median earnings of $72,080 four years after completion, placing the university in the 79th percentile. That median is $3,830 above the peer median, the middle value for comparable institutions (same type and size), of $68,250.
Graduates earn about $2,681 more than the model expects for similar students. This earnings-beyond-expectations measure, the gap between what graduates earn and what the model expects for similar students, stands in the 65th percentile.
The part the model attributes to the factors it measures (field of study, enrollment and the local labor market) adds $8,969. The part it attributes to a remainder it does not explain subtracts $6,288.
Within the measured factors, the STEM component adds $4,323. Azimuth places the return pillar in the 72nd percentile among nonprofit four-year institutions.
Earnings scenarios grounded in the program mix range from $47,835 in the downside scenario to $86,650 in the upside scenario. At the program level, Industrial Production Technologies/Technicians has the highest median earnings: 17 degrees awarded and $89,697 four years after completion.
Its median equals 1.11x the national median for its field. The highest median and largest degree count appear in different fields.
Earnings can vary substantially by field at Ohio Northern University. The downside earnings scenario is $47,835, while the upside scenario reaches $86,650; these are scenarios based on program mix, not observed groups.
Among high-earning fields, Industrial Production Technologies/Technicians completers earn median earnings of $89,697 four years after completion, Mechanical Engineering completers earn $85,802, and Accounting completers earn $84,916. Those field-level figures show why the modeled range is broad.
At Ohio Northern University, borrowing runs somewhat higher than at comparable schools, even as graduates post higher-than-expected earnings. Borrowers who complete have median federal student loan debt of $27,000, above the $24,199 median at comparable institutions (same type and size).
That debt corresponds to an estimated payment of $307 a month if repaid over ten years. Graduates earn about $2,681 more than the model expects for similar students.
The average net price, what aid recipients pay after grants and scholarships, is $24,478, below the $27,371 peer median. Aid covers about 54% of the published cost for the average aid recipient.
Below-peer net price and above-peer borrowing pull in different directions, while earnings beyond expectations provide a favorable outcome measure.