Top Ranked Programs
University of Florida's program mix is anchored in Engineering, with substantial depth across business, biological sciences, and health fields — a portfolio consistent with a large land-grant research university serving 10,061 students annually across 80 programs. Engineering accounts for 13% of graduates, Business represents 12%, and Social Sciences makes up 12% — a distribution that balances high-earning technical fields with broad professional and scientific training. The strongest earnings outcomes cluster in engineering and quantitative disciplines. Azimuth ranks Artificial Intelligence #18 nationally for median earnings four years after enrollment among nonprofit four-year institutions, with 338 graduates earning $126,268. Azimuth ranks Mechanical Engineering #34 nationally for median earnings four years after enrollment among nonprofit four-year institutions, with graduates earning $97,113, and Azimuth ranks Economics #49 nationally for median earnings four years after enrollment among nonprofit four-year institutions, with graduates earning $89,075. Artificial Intelligence stands out as the program combining the largest cohort scale with strong pay — 599 graduates and median earnings of $57,053 four years after enrollment. Among the most popular programs, Biology, General program graduates 595 students with median earnings of $53,645, and the The Business Administration program graduates 452 students with median earnings of $82,615. Engineering subfields and computer science are high-mobility pathways where graduates enter the national labor market directly — four-year earnings in these programs reflect actual workforce outcomes rather than graduate-school deferrals. By contrast, biological sciences programs at University of Florida are more likely grad-school-dependent pathways, where four-year earnings undercount the lifetime trajectory of graduates who continue to medical or doctoral programs. The supply-demand map for college graduates provides context for how University of Florida's dominant program families align with national labor-market demand, and the program-ranking methodology explains how Azimuth evaluates programs across cohort scale, earnings, and benchmark performance.