Graduates earn about $16,558 less than the model expects for similar students. That earnings-beyond-expectations result, the gap between what graduates earn and what the model expects for similar students, falls in Azimuth’s 7th percentile among nonprofit four-year institutions.
The part the model attributes to the factors it measures (field of study, enrollment and the local labor market) adds $8,307. The part it attributes to a remainder it does not explain subtracts $24,865.
Four years after completion, federally aided completers who are working and not enrolled have median earnings of $62,009, in the 57th percentile. The peer median, the middle value for comparable institutions (same type and size), is $65,610; earnings are below it by $3,601.
Azimuth places the return pillar in the 30th percentile among nonprofit four-year institutions. The peer comparison and model comparison point in the same direction.
University of Vermont graduates have middle-range earnings four years after completion. Federally aided completers who are working and not enrolled earn a median of $62,009, placing four-year earnings in the 57th percentile among nonprofit four-year institutions.
The earnings cohort includes 2,346 completers. Earnings scenarios, built from the program mix rather than observed groups, show how outcomes can differ across fields.
An estimated 33.8% of graduates continue to graduate study, a figure estimated from the program mix. The median describes early post-completion pay, while the estimate signals that further study is also part of the picture.
Four years after completing a degree, federally aided graduates who are working and not enrolled earn a median of $62,009, at the 57th percentile. The peer median for comparable institutions (same type and size) is $65,610, leaving the university $3,601 below that mark.
Azimuth ranks University of Vermont #1,034 for return among nonprofit four-year institutions. Graduates earn about $16,558 less than the model expects for similar students.
That result sits at the 7th percentile. The part the model attributes to the factors it measures (field of study, enrollment and the local labor market) adds $8,307.
The part it attributes to a remainder it does not explain subtracts $24,865. Within the measured factors, the STEM component adds $2,404.
The program mix here leans toward the biological sciences, business, and natural resources, with a smaller but notable share of degrees in engineering and nursing. Estimated from that mix, the downside earnings scenario is $45,366 and the upside is $82,603.
An estimated 33.8% of graduates continue to graduate study, based on the program mix.
Earnings differ substantially across the earnings scenarios at University of Vermont. At four years after completion, the downside earnings scenario is $45,366, while the upside scenario is $82,603.
Among the higher program medians at that horizon, Electrical Engineering completers earn $95,036, Mechanical Engineering completers earn $83,438, and Nursing completers earn $82,571. The typical earnings scenario is $62,009, between the downside and upside scenarios.
At University of Vermont, borrowing at completion sits close to peer borrowing, but the earnings and price measures offer little offset. Borrowers who completed had median federal student loan debt of $20,951, above the $20,076 median at comparable institutions (same type and size) by $875.
That debt corresponds to an estimated payment of $238 a month if repaid over ten years. Graduates earn about $16,558 less than the model expects for similar students.
Aid recipients faced an average net price, what they pay after grants and scholarships, of $19,343, above the $15,634 peer median by $3,709. Below-expected earnings, debt above peers, and a higher net price point in the same direction.