Augusta University's published cost of attendance reaches $22,146 annually, consisting of $8,122 in-state tuition, $11,935 for room and board, and $1,240 for books and supplies. Out-of-state students face higher tuition of $23,500, bringing total costs to $37,524.
Select your family income to see your estimated cost
Net prices are averages and may vary. Based on federal data for first-time, full-time students receiving aid.
| Cost Category | Amount |
|---|---|
| Total Cost of Attendance (Sticker Price) | $23,524 |
| Tuition and Fees | $24,734 |
| Room and Board | $12,404 |
| Books and Supplies | $1,240 |
| Average Financial Aid (Grants and Scholarships) | -$9,737 |
| Average Net Price (What Families Pay) | $13,787 |
| Family Income | Net Price |
|---|---|
| $0–30k | $11,064 |
| $30–48k | $11,154 |
| $48–75k | $13,703 |
| $75–110k | $17,548 |
| $110k+ | $18,163 |
Augusta University's published cost of attendance reaches $22,146 annually, consisting of $8,122 in-state tuition, $11,935 for room and board, and $1,240 for books and supplies. Out-of-state students face higher tuition of $23,500, bringing total costs to $37,524. However, the average student pays just $13,347 after financial aid, representing savings of $8,799 from the sticker price.
This net price compares favorably to regional peers, though running $746 above the peer median of $14,093. The financial aid system reduces costs substantially across all income levels, with the most significant support directed toward lower-income families. Net prices range from $10,597 for families earning under $30,000 to $16,901 for those earning over $110,000, creating a progressive cost structure that supports educational access.
Augusta University demonstrates strong financial aid delivery with 38.4% Pell share significantly above many regional institutions. The $8,799 average reduction from sticker price to net price indicates meaningful aid packaging across the student population.
Lower-income students benefit most from aid targeting, with families under $30,000 receiving aid that reduces costs to $10,597. The progressive net price structure from $10,597 to $16,901 across income tiers reflects effective need-based aid allocation rather than broad-based discounting.
Financial aid effectiveness supports the institution's Mobility Engine classification by making education accessible to students from diverse economic backgrounds. The combination of moderate sticker prices with targeted aid delivery creates affordability without requiring extreme discounting strategies.
How much students borrow and whether debt is manageable given outcomes.
Debt is well below typical first-year earnings — generally considered very manageable.
Augusta University graduates carry median debt of $20,500, slightly below the peer median of $21,105 and demonstrating controlled borrowing relative to similar institutions. Debt levels vary from $5,500 at the 25th percentile to $20,500 at the 75th percentile, with the narrow range suggesting consistent aid packaging and borrowing patterns.
The debt-to-earnings ratio of 0.42 indicates manageable repayment obligations relative to graduate income levels of $48,472. Parent PLUS borrowing averages $14,696 with monthly payments of $194, representing additional family investment in education.
Federal data shows debt performance at the 66th percentile, indicating above average debt levels but within manageable ranges. The combination of controlled institutional debt below peer levels with moderate earnings creates sustainable repayment conditions for most graduates.
How cost compares to graduate earnings and value added.
Augusta University delivers educational value through controlled costs and specialized career preparation, particularly in health professions. While earnings beyond expectations show -$2,061, indicating outcomes slightly below predicted levels, the institution compensates through below-peer debt levels and strong low-income graduate earnings of $63,500.
Return performance ranks around the national average at the 41.8th percentile, reflecting regional career focus rather than earnings maximization. The debt-to-earnings ratio of 0.42 supports manageable repayment, while affordability performance at the 79.8th percentile demonstrates strong cost control.
Low-income graduates achieving top 25% earnings performance indicates effective economic mobility despite modest overall returns. The investment case centers on accessible education leading to stable career preparation, particularly valuable for students seeking health professions pathways.
