For federally aided completers who are working and not enrolled, Marist University has median earnings of $78,561 four years after completion. Azimuth places that earnings measure in the 87th percentile among nonprofit four-year institutions.
The peer median, the middle value for comparable institutions (same type and size), is $68,250; Marist stands above it by $10,311. Azimuth puts the return pillar in the 82nd percentile among nonprofit four-year institutions.
For earnings beyond expectations, graduates earn about $5,761 less than the model expects for similar students. That result is in the 33rd percentile.
The part the model attributes to the factors it measures (field of study, enrollment and the local labor market) adds $9,667. The part it attributes to a remainder it does not explain subtracts $15,428.
The return picture is mixed: earnings sit above the peer median but fall short of the model’s expectation.
Marist University has a high earnings median four years after completion, but its earnings-beyond-expectations measure points the other way. Federally aided completers who are working and not enrolled have median earnings of $78,561 four years after completion.
Azimuth places this earnings figure in the 87th percentile among nonprofit four-year institutions, based on an earnings cohort of 1,698 completers. Graduates earn about $5,761 less than the model expects for similar students.
Program-mix earnings scenarios include a typical outcome of $78,561 four years after completion. An estimated 26.3% of graduates continue to graduate study, a figure estimated from the program mix.
The high earnings median and lower-than-expected model result pull in different directions.
Marist University has a mixed return picture. Median earnings are $78,561 four years after completion, placing the university in the 87th percentile.
The peer median, the middle value for comparable institutions (same type and size), is $68,250, with Marist’s figure $10,311 above it. For earnings beyond expectations, the gap between what graduates earn and what the model expects for similar students, graduates earn about $5,761 less than the model expects for similar students.
That result is in the 33rd percentile. The part the model attributes to the factors it measures (field of study, enrollment and the local labor market) adds $9,667.
The part it attributes to a remainder it does not explain subtracts $15,428. Within the measured factors, the STEM component adds $941.
Earnings scenarios grounded in the program mix range from a downside of $58,042 to an upside of $101,704. Azimuth places the return pillar in the 82nd percentile among nonprofit four-year institutions.
The largest program, Business Administration and Management, awarded 270 degrees and had median earnings of $90,855 four years after completion. Higher-earning fields include Economics, with 21 degrees awarded and median earnings of $118,557, and Computer Science, with 46 degrees awarded and median earnings of $111,893.
The pattern pairs broad degree production in the first pair with higher earnings in the latter pair.
Earnings can differ sharply across earnings scenarios and fields at the university. The downside scenario is $58,042 four years after completion, while the upside scenario is $101,704; these are earnings scenarios based on the program mix rather than observed groups.
At Marist University, aid recipients face a higher price than peers despite borrowing that stays close to the peer norm. Average net price, what aid recipients pay after grants and scholarships, is $41,544, above the peer median, the middle value for comparable institutions (same type and size), of $27,371.
Aid covers about 39% of the published cost for the average aid recipient. Among borrowers who completed, median federal student loan debt is $25,000.
That is above the $24,199 peer median for comparable institutions (same type and size). That debt corresponds to an estimated payment of $284 a month if repaid over ten years.
Graduates earn about $5,761 less than the model expects for similar students. Higher average net price and slightly above-peer debt sit alongside a less favorable model result.