Compare 43 Construction Engineering Technology/Technician. programs ranked by graduate earnings. Average earnings: $78,588. Top programs: $100,890+.
| Rank | School | Program Earnings | Cohort Size | Student Debt | Student GPS | Parent Debt | Parent GPS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #26 | Liberty UniversityPrivate | $76,295 | 32 | $24,500 | Excellent | $16,398 | Good |
| #27 | University Of MainePublic | $76,295 | 32 | $25,000 | Excellent | $21,900 | Manageable |
| #28 | Colorado Mesa UniversityPublic | $76,203 | 24 | $22,000 | Excellent | $18,879 | Good |
| #29 | $75,677 | 39 | $22,095 | Excellent | $18,310 | Good | |
| #30 | $74,199 | 54 | $23,199 | Excellent | $14,621 | Good | |
| #31 | $72,707 | 35 | $23,250 | Excellent | $22,000 | Manageable | |
| #32 | $72,268 | 25 | $22,000 | Excellent | $10,492 | Good | |
| #33 | Temple UniversityPublic | $72,240 | 22 | $24,395 | Excellent | $36,495 | Challenging |
| #34 | $72,231 | 22 | $15,000 | Excellent | $25,565 | Manageable | |
| #35 | $70,481 | 24 | $19,606 | Excellent | $17,125 | Good | |
| #36 | $69,338 | 28 | $19,250 | Excellent | $23,211 | Manageable | |
| #37 | University Of ToledoPublic | $68,384 | 33 | $22,250 | Excellent | $19,243 | Manageable |
| #38 | $68,284 | 31 | $21,229 | Excellent | $14,984 | Good | |
| #39 | $66,808 | 18 | $21,500 | Excellent | $12,362 | Good | |
| #40 | $60,575 | 29 | $27,000 | Good | $16,012 | Manageable | |
| #41 | Wayne State UniversityPublic | $53,310 | 15 | $21,250 | Good | $16,378 | Manageable |
| #42 | $53,108 | 54 | $22,135 | Good | $18,071 | Challenging | |
| #43 | $50,439 | 13 | $19,968 | Good | $11,334 | Manageable |
Our program rankings answer: "Which schools have the best outcomes for graduates of this specific major?"
Unlike traditional rankings that measure overall school quality, these rankings focus on program-level outcomes. A school that's #200 overall might have a top-10 nursing program — and that matters if you're studying nursing.
Data based on 2024-2025 Dept of Education reporting standards. Learn about our methodology →