Return at Texas A&M University-Kingsville is mixed: graduates earn about $9,314 more than the model expects for similar students. That earnings-beyond-expectations measure, the gap between what graduates earn and what the model expects for similar students, is in the 82nd percentile.
Azimuth places the return pillar in the 53rd percentile among nonprofit four-year institutions. The part the model attributes to the factors it measures (field of study, enrollment and the local labor market) adds $1,068.
The part it attributes to a remainder it does not explain adds $8,246. Four years after completion, the median earnings figure is $56,982, in the 39th percentile among nonprofit four-year institutions.
The peer median, the middle value for comparable institutions (same type and size), is $57,301, with Texas A&M University-Kingsville below it by $319. Higher-than-expected earnings and a modest peer edge sit alongside a lower earnings percentile.
The schoolwide earnings measure is a useful starting point, while earnings scenarios show that outcomes can differ across program mixes. Among federally aided completers who are working and not enrolled, Texas A&M University-Kingsville reports median earnings of $56,982 four years after completion.
Azimuth places that earnings measure in the 39th percentile among nonprofit four-year institutions. The measure is based on an earnings cohort of 1,177 completers.
The typical earnings scenario is $56,982 four years after completion; scenarios are model outputs, not observed groups. An estimated 27.1% of graduates continue to graduate study, a figure estimated from the program mix.
The median gives the schoolwide reference point, and the scenarios supply context for differences by field.
Texas A&M University-Kingsville posts median earnings of $56,982 four years after completion, in the 39th percentile among nonprofit four-year institutions. The peer median, the middle value for comparable institutions (same type and size), is $57,301, with the university below it by $319.
Graduates earn about $9,314 more than the model expects for similar students, placing earnings beyond expectations. That gap is in the 82nd percentile.
The part the model attributes to the factors it measures (field of study, enrollment and the local labor market) adds $1,068. The part it attributes to a remainder it does not explain adds $8,246.
Within the measured factors, the STEM component adds $3,081. Earnings scenarios grounded in the program mix run from $42,526 on the downside to $84,300 on the upside.
Azimuth places the return pillar in the 53rd percentile among nonprofit four-year institutions, pairing earnings above the peer median with higher-than-expected earnings. At the high end of the program earnings data, Chemical Engineering has 29 degrees awarded and median earnings of $97,811 four years after completion.
Azimuth ranks it #75 nationally within its field.
Program choice matters here: earnings scenarios run from $42,526 in the downside scenario to $84,300 in the upside scenario, both four years after completion. These are earnings scenarios rather than observed groups.
The higher end is illustrated by Chemical Engineering at $97,811, Electrical Engineering at $94,810, and Mechanical Engineering at $88,830 four years after completion. Those field-level medians show why the modeled range is wider than the schoolwide figure alone suggests.
For families weighing price against outcomes, Texas A&M University-Kingsville has an average net price below that of comparable institutions. The average net price, what aid recipients pay after grants and scholarships, is $12,090, below the $14,068 peer median for comparable institutions (same type and size) by $1,978.
Graduates earn about $9,314 more than the model expects for similar students. Among federal-loan borrowers who completed, median federal student loan debt is $22,934, above the $21,229 peer median at comparable institutions (same type and size) by $1,705.
That debt corresponds to an estimated payment of $261 a month if repaid over ten years. The lower net price and higher-than-expected earnings point favorably, though borrower debt sits above the peer median.